http://www.diigo.com/user/nyefrank/norco?tab=253 To recover for negligence under the principles of general foreseeability, plaintiff must establish facts from which the fact finder could determine that (1) defendant’s conduct caused a foreseeable risk of harm; (2) the risk is to an interest of the kind that the law protects against negligent invasion; (3) defendant’s conduct was unreasonable in light of the risks; (4) the conduct caused plaintiff’s harm; and (4) plaintiff was in the class of persons and plaintiff’s injury was within the general type of potential injuries that made defendant’s conduct negligent. Slogowski v. Lyness, 324 Or. 436, 441, 927 P.2d 587, 589 (1996). The evidence in this record, and alleged in plaintiff’s complaint, does all of the above.
Monday, November 16, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dc9c3grn_3099gg8gwfdp
Phil Reddish telling on him self
http://riversidecountyhomicide.blogspot.com/2009/04/yagman-on-calif-supreme-court-us-judges.html?showComment=1240593360000